Thursday, March 11, 2010

Joel Pollak Fundraiser on Wednesday Night


Joel Pollak, my old co-worker with Alan Dershowitz, friend, and fellow Big Government writer, is running for Congress against Jan "Single Payer" Schakowsky.

I've written about Joel before here, but it's going to be a special treat to see him this Wednesday, March 17th.

I realize that it is during Spring Break, but I'm told to publicize the event widely. Here's the website. The information is copied below and for those of you wondering, here are Joel's issues.

March 17th, 2009
7:00 PM
The home of Abigail and Zach Shrier
1620 S. Crest Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90035

Please RSVP to Ashley Kain, Deputy Campaign Manger, Joel Pollak for Congress at Ashley@pollakforcongress.com or 847-347-6082

$50 suggested donation to the campaign


“One of the biggest stories I’ve ever seen uncovered in my life… was [uncovered by] Joel Pollak, who’s running against Jan Schakowsky.”
“Joel Pollak found the book, and he wrote a piece… it was one of the great moments. My heart was pounding because it was objectively and obviously truthful…”

- Andrew Breitbart CPAC 2010

Join us in an evening with Andrew Breitbart and Joel Pollak.
“Taking On and Taking Down the Chicago-D.C. Machine”

Andrew Breitbart, Commentator for the Washington Times, Author of Breitbart.com, breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, and Big Journalism, regular guest host for Dennis Miller’s nationally-syndicated radio program.

Joel Pollak, a Harvard-educated human rights lawyer and critically-acclaimed author, is the GOP candidate running against incumbent Jan Schakowsky in Illinois’ 9th District. Joel rose to national prominence after challenging Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA), asking: “How much, if any, responsibility do you have for the financial crisis”? The ‘debate’ became a YouTube and TV sensation and support for Joel has been pouring in from around the country.


Special VIP Opportunity with Breitbart and Joel Pollak
We will be having a special opportunity to meet with Andrew Breitbart in the first 15 minutes of the event. There will be a $250 contribution per person or $450 for a group of two for this opportunity. We will allow all VIPs to take their photo with Breitbart and Joel Pollak.


Please notify Ashley Kain for VIP meeting or sign up here:

http://pollakforcongress.com/LAreception

$50 suggested donation to the campaign

Contributions to Pollak for Congress are not tax deductible as charitable donations for federal income tax purposes.

Federal Election Law requires political committees to report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer for each individual whose contributions aggregate in excess of $200 in a calendar year. Contributions from corporations and foreign nationals are prohibited. Individuals are limited to $2,400 per election (primary and general) for a total of $4,800 per cycle or $9,600 per couple on joint bank accounts.

Dean Hess Quoted on Obama's Pick for the Fed


Janet Yellen is apparently going to be Obama's appointee for vice chairman of the Fed. But should she be appointed? Dean Hess was quoted for Business Week. Here's his response:

Gregory Hess, a former Fed economist who’s now faculty dean at Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, California, said Yellen’s views on inflation may be “worrisome” to investors and could result in higher bond yields.

“She would create a wider chasm” with other Fed policy makers who are more likely to favor higher interest rates, Hess said.

Personal Cost

“She truly does understand the costs of recessions, and I think she does understand the personal cost that this puts on people’s lives,” said Hess, a member of the Shadow Open Market Committee, a group of economists that critiques Fed policy and has traditionally favored keeping inflation close to zero. “The question is, does she take that too far in the implementation of policy?

Romney Book Tops Bestseller List; Tour Lists CMC as "Claremont College"

Mitt Romney is coming to speak at Claremont McKenna on April 15. His book, No Apologies: The Case for American Greatness, now ranks as number one on the bestsellers list, according to the Politico.

Unfortunately, Mitt Romney's book tour lists that speaking engagement at Claremont McKenna as "Claremont College." I commented that that wasn't right on the Facebook group, but as of yet, no change.

In any event, to get us prepared for Romney's speech, here are several short video clips where he reads from the book.

Here is talking about the presidential race and his views on current affairs.




And here is talking about his views on education.

No More TNCs?!


From Andrew Cosentino's party inform:

Per order of the Dean of Students office, TNC is canceled indefinitely. This isn't because of one specific incident, but as DOS examines certain policy issues TNCs will unfortunately remain off the Calender. I assure you that we are doing everything we can to remedy the situation.
I wrote about Dean Mary Spellman back in the day about how she ended the drinking culture at Sarah Lawrence, well, look's like she's done that here, too.

Exit question: What will ASCMC waste our money on now? My bet is pizza at all the Senate meetings. Oh wait, you mean Chris Jones is already doing that?

Just Che No: Why is Pomona's Sociology Event Studying Che?


From: Markus Kessler [mailto:markus.r.kessler@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:23 PM
To: Ernie Mendoza
Subject: CHE Movie Screening

Pomona College sociology liaisons will be hosting a Sociology Movie Night this evening at 7:00 p.m. in the SOCA lounge (corner of 6th and College Wy). Professor Colin Beck will discuss revolutionary movements, followed by a screening of Che, Part I. Snacks will be provided. Everyone is welcome.

Associated Press Writes on DeVore (CMC '85) Bid


Calif. Senate challenger says his time has arrived

Thursday, March 11, 2010

(03-11) 16:06 PST LOS ANGELES, (AP) --

In many other states, U.S. Senate candidate Chuck DeVore could be a rising political star, aligning himself with the budding tea party movement and the growing animosity toward increases in government spending.

A termed-out lawmaker known for his right-wing rhetoric on the floor of the California Assembly, DeVore has the pedigree of the ideal conservative candidate: leader in the Orange County Republican Party, Desert Storm veteran and officer in the Army National Guard, consistent record speaking out against tax hikes and critic of global warming.

His critiques even have been bipartisan. DeVore didn't like the bank bailout that began under President George W. Bush and he has railed against the Obama administration's efforts to sustain automakers and combat the recession.

It's that consistency that has made DeVore popular with skeptics of federal interventions of just about any sort and has endeared him to the most loyal party die-hards.

In California, however, being the darling of conservative activists and elements of the tea party movement goes only so far.

A Field Poll released in January showed that just 6 percent of likely voters in June's Republican primary said they would support DeVore in the Senate race against his opponents, former congressman Tom Campbell and former Hewlett-Packard Co. chief executive Carly Fiorina.

Barack Obama's 24-point victory over John McCain two years ago in California suggests a right-wing candidate such as DeVore would have face great difficulty in a statewide general election. Republicans in the state have slipped to just 31 percent of the electorate.

DeVore is undeterred. Despite greater name recognition for his primary opponents, DeVore believes he is best positioned to catch the rising tide against government deficit spending. He also believes his record of advocating small-government principles makes him the best candidate to challenge Democrat Barbara Boxer, who is seeking a fourth term in the Senate.

Each candidate will be appealing to primary voters this weekend during the California Republican Party convention in Santa Clara, the biggest stage so far for them to gauge their viability.

DeVore, 47, lags as badly in fundraising as he does in the polls, yet has managed to carve out a niche in the Republican primary contest, serving as Fiorina's main foil. His criticism of the wealthy former CEO began when the Republican contest was a two-candidate race and has increased since the moderate Campbell entered the race in January.

He has surprised Fiorina at least twice when she was a guest on talk radio programs, calling in to challenge her conservative credentials. One such exchange last month prompted Fiorina to respond, "Quit attacking me and start talking to the voters of California about what you would actually do."

When a Fiorina Web advertisement criticized Campbell as a wolf in sheep's clothing on fiscal matters, it was the Devore campaign that portrayed the ad as a fiasco, helping to propel the phrase "demon sheep" into California political lore.

He has been particularly adept at highlighting any missteps that could reveal Fiorina's unfamiliarity with an issue, such as when she said California should not rule out bankruptcy as an option for its current financial problems. States cannot legally file for bankruptcy protection.

If he doesn't win the June primary, DeVore seems intent on taking Fiorina down with him. By comparison, his criticism of Campbell, who as emerged as the front-runner, has been muted.

"Campbell would be the stronger candidate," DeVore said when asked to explain his attacks on Fiorina. "Campbell's flaws are less fatal and exploitable."

Others see DeVore's attacks on Fiorina as pure political calculation. Where Campbell is a social moderate in favor of gay marriage and abortion rights, DeVore and Fiorina are trying to appeal to the party's most conservative elements to gain voters for the June primary.

"He and Fiorina are competing for the same votes, because Fiorina made a strategic decision to go to the right," said Jack Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College in Southern California. "His underlying message is that if you want a strong, conservative alternative to Tom Campbell, it's Chuck DeVore, not Carly Fiorina."

A campaign spokeswoman for Fiorina said DeVore's attention shows he is much more worried about her than Campbell.

"It's a recognition that Tom Campbell's record won't square with California primary voters," spokeswoman Julie Soderlund said. "It's a recognition that Campbell will fall in the polls and that Carly is truly the one to beat."

Yet trying to appeal to California's most conservative voters also puts Fiorina — and DeVore, if he manages an upset victory in June — in danger taking stands that could come back to haunt them in the general election.

For example, Fiorina criticized a Boxer proposal to tax the bonuses of CEOs at financial institutions that received a taxpayer bailout through the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which began under Bush. Polling indicates that a special tax on corporate bonuses has widespread appeal with Republicans, Democrats and independents. Democrats and independents account for two-thirds of the California electorate.

Soderlund stressed that Fiorina opposes tax increases of any kind and that she had called on all board members and executives at companies receiving bailout money to resign.

DeVore said he won't back away from his conservative opinions if his campaign makes it beyond June. In fact, he said, there has never been a better time to run as an unabashed conservative in left-leaning California.

He said he believes voters are worried about the expansion of the federal government and what he considers to be out-of-control government spending.

"Unlike my competitors in the Republican primary," DeVore said, "I'm the real deal and I can win."

The Right Blogosphere Versus Adam Kokesh CMC '06

There's no excuse to fly the flag upside down

Michelle Malkin weighed in today to discuss how Adam Kokesh CMC '06 is not a real conservative. She recommended that the New Mexico Republican Party get its "head out of the sand" and avoid nominating Adam Kokesh.

And Hotair.com's Green Room calls Adam Kokesh "an IVAW [Iraq Veterans Against the War] traitor in G.O.P. clothing."

Here are the relevant selections:

I spoke to the New Mexico Republican Party’s communications director today about his running in the primary as a Republican. The problem is that anyone who is a registered Republican can choose to run in a primary race. There’s nothing that can legally be done to keep him from identifying himself as a Republican, despite the fact that he holds absolutely no conservative or Republican principles. He talks like a patriot now, but what about his actions over the past six years? Apparently, we’re supposed to just forget all about them, and there are apparently plenty who are willing to do that. Kokesh is now appearing on Fox News with Judge Napolitano. He’s been endorsed by the Republican Liberty Caucus, the 912 Project, and of course, Ron Paul. He’s being praised as a “constitutional candidate”, which is utter bull considering he encourages members of the military to break their oath to always defend the Constitution. The man is a disgrace to the country and especially to the Marine Corps.

Yet he’s raising money. He’s getting attention.

There’s another option for District 3 Republicans: Tom Mullins. He deserves our support, and Kokesh deserves to be exposed as the anti-military, anti-American traitor that he is. If you know anyone who lives in New Mexico, make sure to pass this on and get the word out. We can’t let Kokesh get away with such a blatant lie. His home is not in the Republican Party, and unfortunately, the only way to ensure that is to make sure he does not get elected. So help us expose him for the traitorous fraud he is.






Charles Kesler's Real Clear Politics Piece on the Tea Parties

The Tea Party Spirit

By Charles Kesler

Sometimes the most obvious derangements of our politics are staring us in the face but we don't see them. Take, for instance, the health care reform bill for which President Obama and the Democrats are forever lusting. Many people have protested it isn't really a reform bill, because reform implies improvement and this isn't an improvement.

But it isn't the "reform" part of the Democrats' health care bill (if they ever agree on one) that strikes me as most perverse. It's calling this voluminous monstrosity a bill. Can you have a bill, a single law, that is almost 3,000 pages long? In the old days, that would have constituted a whole code of laws. When our founders thought about law, they often thought along the lines of John Locke, who described law as a community's "settled standing rules, indifferent, and the same to all parties," emphasizing that to be legitimate a statute must be "received and allowed by common consent to be the standard of right and wrong, and the common measure to decide all controversies" between citizens.

This phonebook-sized law that would control a sixth of the U.S. economy cannot be a law by that definition. If you rummage through the text of, say, the House of Representatives' version of the bill, you find scores of places where power is delegated to administrative agencies and special boards, which are charged to fill the gaps in the written legislation by promulgating thousands, if not tens of thousands, of new pages of regulations that will then be applied to individual cases. Voters sometimes complain that legislators don't read the laws they enact. Why would they, in this case? You could read this leviathan until your eyeballs popped out and still not find any "settled, standing rules" or a meaning that is "indifferent, and the same to all parties."

In fact, that's the point of such promiscuous laws. They operate not by setting up fences to protect each man's liberty. They start not from equal rights but from equal (and often unequal) privileges, the favors or benefits that government may bestow on or withhold from its clients. The whole point is to empower government officials, usually unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats, to bless or curse your petitions as they see fit, guided, of course, by their expertness in a law so vast, so intricate, and so capricious that it could justify a hundred different outcomes in the same case. Faster than one might think, a government of equal laws turns into a regime of arbitrary privileges.

A "privilege" is literally a private law. When law ceases to be a common "standard of right and wrong" and a "common measure to decide all controversies," then the rule of law ceases to be republican and becomes despotic. Freedom itself ceases to be a right and becomes a gift, or the fruit of a corrupt bargain, because in such degraded regimes those who are close to and connected with the ruling class have special privileges.
* * *

It was against the threat of such a despotism that proper and not so proper Bostonians threw the original Tea Party. The English East India Company was about to go bankrupt, and the British government bailed it out by passing the Tea Act of 1773, granting the Company's agents a monopoly on selling tea to Americans and filling the government's own coffers by taxing the sales. The Americans had already rejected this tax as unconstitutional in 1767, but it stayed on the books. Among the Company's agents in Massachusetts were the royal governor's two sons and a nephew. They didn't call it Chicago-style politics then, but the principles were the same.

Today's Tea Party movement sees a similar threat of despotism-of monopoly control of health care, corrupting bailouts, massive indebtedness, and the eclipse of constitutional rights-in the Obama Administration's policies. The Tea Party patriots may mistake the President's motives when they compare him to King George. But they are right to suspect in the very nature of modern liberalism and the modern state something hostile to the consent of the governed and to constitutional liberty. The republic will owe them a debt of gratitude if Obama's plans end up just as wet as George III's, floating in the salty tea pot of Boston Harbor.

Charles R. Kesler is a senior fellow of The Claremont Institute and editor of the Claremont Review of Books. Respond to the author here.
Page Printed from: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/03/10/the_tea_party_spirit_104699.html at March 11, 2010 - 03:42:28 AM CST