Showing newest 38 of 56 posts from September 2009. Show older posts
Showing newest 38 of 56 posts from September 2009. Show older posts

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

RuPaul Charles: And a Wasted Evening at the Ath

Initial thought on RuPaul Charles: It could have been worse.


On the one hand, he's be applauded for not using some of his cruder language. (He abbreviated M.F. for the audience so as to keep it G-rated.) On the other hand, it seems as if those of us who questioned him being brought to the Ath have been vindicated by the silliness of his presentation.

In the wisdom he supposedly dispensed from the "inside," he seemed to be appealing to a kind of Gnosticism -- a transcendence that culminates in the nonsensical phrase, "that we're all one gender, really."

And he decried materialism. Of course, that's just the kind of thing one is required to say if one lives in Hollywood and is a self-described "star." But then he said that he loves shopping and likes to wear by his own admission three different set of clothes a day. I'm just as confused as you are.

His message of comforting your supposed inner child suggests a level of childishness and impulsiveness. His joy, he said, comes from being good to his inner child and recognizing that inner child in everyone. "We're all really just little kids," he said. No thanks, some of us are adults.

One of the odder moments of the evening came when he showed off pictures of himself in drag. RuPaul, who is black, pointed to a picture of himself in drag wearing a Confederate flag as trousers. "Why you might ask was I wearing a Confederate flag?" he asked the audience, rhetorically, "because the South shall rise again!"

The audience chuckled. The first person to say that said it in Latin -- John Wilkes Booth after he assassinated Lincoln.

Only in America could a black man -- descendant, no doubt, from slaves in Louisiana -- so extol his own personal freedom to dress like a woman, be so ignorant of the sacrifice of a man who risked all to give it to his antecedents.

Later, a student in the audience confessed himself to enjoying dressing up in drag as "Okama Jinja" -- his drag persona to the approving claps of the crowd.

And just like that, the purpose of the Athenaeum, has become supplanted. What was meant to encourage, in the fashion of the famous athenaeum of London, "the life of the mind" has now become a temple to the vulgar.

It seems CMC's "scholars" are more intent to get the marshmallows on the spits and be merry while Rome burns. Let this be a lesson to anyone so considering donating money for a speaker series to the Athenaeum.

The Debate Forgot Our History

attended the student debate last night and have to say that I was a bit disappointed with what I heard.

In part, this was brought about by the rather distracting text message board placed up on the projection screen in the back room, which I confess to having had some (but not nearly enough) fun distorting for the sake of a few cheap laughs. But even was I was able to pay attention to the speakers, I wasn’t hearing what would have made the discussion worthwhile.

In such debates, I find it instructive to ground our understanding of what CMC is in its history. What did President George C. S. Benson have to say on the matter of what kind of college Claremont McKenna should be? Here I direct you once again to his masterful assessment presented in a speech entitled, “How Pink Are Our Colleges”? I recommend the reading as it is pretty clear that Benson did not see a distinction between teaching “practical affairs” and the liberal arts. Instead, this division, constantly cultivated, produced solid and effective custodians of the American system. “We are going to see that the graduates of one college in the country have a clear-cut conception of the values of American economic heritage,” Benson told Colonel J. G. Boswell.

And he saw the liberal arts widely enough to encompass Peter Drucker, a healthy appreciation for the American founding, Lincoln, Goethe, Tocqueville, and others as encouraging a kind of liberalization of American business elites. Most of Claremont’s graduates he reasoned would be men of “public affairs” or businessmen and so familiarity with these great thinkers would serve to both enrich their lives and form the basis for the corporations or polities that the graduates would one day lead. It was leadership, as we are found of saying, but it had a direction and a purpose: namely, the preservation of the American way of life — a way of life that was accessible to all peoples.

But at the same time that Benson stressed the virtues of the Declaration of Independence and individualism, he fought for a professor of real estate and counseled students to take accounting — a required course. So the technical balanced appropriately the liberal arts.

If there is any problem with our current existence of Claremont McKenna, it is that much violence has been done to this harmony between both the technical and the humanities. The reason so many majored in both government and economics (or accounting) was that practical and ethereal could and indeed, should exist in one man’s mind, operating simultaneously.

In our present times, many fear that the financial tail of $200 million dollars will wag the liberal arts dog. But this reaction is terribly shortsighted. Claremont ought to be grateful that its alums — many of whom are in finance — feel compelled to generosity to their alma mater. It is doubtful that the rather posh lifestyles of academics could long endure were it not for that benevolence.

Instead, I encourage my friends in the humanities department to dig deep in the history of the college and find some kind of accommodation between the liberal arts and finance side the college. And I encourage my friends in the finance department to make a more substantive argument in favor of why finance and management ought to be properly understood as a liberal art.

Otherwise our current problem seems intractable. This hitherto approach of balancing the practical with the mental is frayed. It is that both of them have gotten too out of whack.

To Ink Or Not to Ink That Is The Question...

I've decided to get a tattoo. Call it a quarter-life crisis, call it youthful rebellion, or whatever, but I am more or less convinced that I have to do it. Don't worry, it'll be tasteful. But I don't want to spoil what it is before I get it.

I know that this isn't exactly a Claremont connection, but I figured I might make it one by asking my fellow Claremont students and alums if they know of any local parlors that offer reasonable price and safety. (Read: I don't want HIV/AIDs.)

Yes, this means I won't be able to donate blood anytime soon. But hey, I can live with that.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Our Drinking Culture and How We Might Fix It

A few quick thoughts on the changing culture with respect to drinking.

GIs built Claremont McKenna College. These young men didn't have to be told about freedom or responsibility: they bled for it on the sands of Normandy and Okinawa.

Many of them just wanted to live their lives and go on their merry way to graduation and the workforce. They got rowdy and drank, just as all men home from war do, but seldom did it get out of hand.

It is with this history in mind that I turn to the drinking culture on campus. And seldom have I seen such a lack of self-preservation on the part of some of my fellow students.

This is surprising because up til now the college has treated us as if we were adults. Witness the more libertine policies that the college promotes -- multiple days for free sexual disease testings, free condoms, and a "don't ask, don't tell" policy on alcohol. And a student -- here on a Gates scholarship -- after he blew a .40 -- has the most minor of punishments. Reportedly, he must attend some alcohol counseling and write something to the effect of not drinking to excess again. Never you mind that a .40 can -- and often does-- become fatal. We're told by the R.A.s -- seldom available when needed -- that this might mean that the college's culture will inexorably change -- all because one student decided to misbehave. In fairness to the RAs, many students have misbehaved, but why should the handful ne'er do wells make the policy that governs the rest of us?
If you are treated as an adult, it is time to act like one. The punishments for breaking CMC's alcohol policy need to be stiffer for those who break them and wind up in a hospital bed, not for those of us who can handle our liquor and have a sense of shame. Here are a few recommendations:
  • RAs should have their pay docked if their dorms have high rates of emergency room visits, especially if they do not make it abundantly clear on their whiteboard who is on duty and for how long.
  • It should be an automatic semester off once a student is sent to the emergency room.
  • Students from the other colleges that do damage at our school or go to the emergency
Have any other recommendations? I'd love to hear them.

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Deb Wood's White Board Policing: Can We Get a Crime Report?

I've been pounding the pavement up at Scripps College, asking Scrippsies just what was written on that whiteboard that seems to have set Dean Deb Wood off. It was a reference to a popular television program. Anyone know which one?


Curious minds want to know.




SNL's Jenny Slate To Be Punished for Speech?

I know that this is not exactly Claremont related, but I thought it would be instructive anyways given how much we're languishing under speech codes.


Jenny Slate of Saturday Night Live may well be fired from the late night show because she accidentally said the word "fuckin.'"

In a former life, I went to prep school. As luck would have it, it's the same that Ms. Slate went to, which you can now find out by reading the Wikipedia link I put up.(Ah yes, the best revenge isn't living well. It's writing the school's Wikipedia page.) She was involved in some of the speech and debate activities at the school and was a pretty successful actress in the drama department. It would be a real shame for her career to get terminated for saying something that the FCC doesn't approve of.

It might be a stretch, but I remember Milton Academy as a school that was very regressive in what you could or couldn't say. Nearly every issue of the school newspaper, The Milton Measure, was spent with me, debating the principal, Rick Hardy, or Larry Pollans, our faculty sponsor, about what was going to be going into the newspaper. These things try on man's soul and make him ever so grateful for Blogger.

Milton Academy is a school where you could be punished for what you wrote, what you said, and even what you thought in kangaroo courts known as D.C. hearings. A student was banned from running for head monitor (think class president) when he joked that the school was all about "giving head... monitors the powers they need." I happened to find his joke distasteful, but I wasn't about to think he should be banned.

So when I hear Ms. Slate may face punishment by the heads of the national censoring organization, the FCC, I'm saddened. But I'm also grateful that she'll be in a position to respond. So often, the speech police win.

Eh, Deb Wood?

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Video: Christian Lander of Stuff White People Like

Pomona Student Union posted the video to Christian Lander of the popular blog, Stuff White People like. (Way to go PSU, by the way. If only the Ath showed that kind of dedication to putting stuff on line...)

I haven't watched this video yet, so let me know if it's worth watching. I tend to avoid anything that purports to be a serious discussion on race.

Humor's Role in Discussions of Race - Christian Lander from Pomona Student Union on Vimeo.



It really ought to be Stuff White Liberals Like, but hey, you can't do that because then they would stop coming. It's best if we keep the joke to ourselves.

Robert VerBruggen of National Review Online's Phi Beta Cons wrote a pretty funny (and insightful) review of Lander's work making much the same point.

Roxana Saberi at the Ath: A Misguided View of Human Rights

Roxana Saberi to the Athenaeum Wednesday evening. Ms. Saberi was captured by the thuggish Iranian regime and kept in captivity for 100 days.

As she detailed the gross human rights violations for religious minorities and women, I immediately remembered the soft-spoken, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who came to speak last semester. But aside from their beauty, there isn't much they share. While Ms. Ali believes in the importance of ideas, Ms. Saberi sits behind the vague generalities of "diversity" and "human rights" without really probing these ideas.

I asked a rather impolitic question about what it was like being a beauty queen from North Dakota. (Apparently, Ms. Saberi went around talking about the importance of cultural diversity -- multiculturalism hasn't reached those to the north yet, obviously.)

We got Ms. Saberi talking after that story, despite the efforts of a few of the guys at the table to talk politics rather than about her experiences. Gentlemen, you don't immediately introduce politics into a dinner conversation. Rather, it's best to start with flattery. A tip to the wise from he who hath erred in the past. But I digress.

I have a video copy of Ms. Saberi's talk, but as I am respecting the wishes of the Athenaeum, apparently acting through Saberi's wishes, and not putting it online. I can, of course, send you a copy, should you want it and will be reprinting some of the quotations from it here or elsewhere.

Much of the talk was lackluster, with Ms. Saberi refusing to actually make any significant points other than the usual pabulum we hear from the media. For an interesting take on what's actually going on in Iran, here's a great article I recommend.

After he talk, Professor Ward Elliott pointed out something that I had only tangentially noticed. All of the songs that Ms. Saberi played and many of the signs were in English. It's almost as if they were trying to make an appeal to America. Naturally, this appeal went unremarked.

But one of the statements that most bothered me that Ms. Saberi made was in regards to whether or not she wanted the government to be secular or religious. To this she replied, that
"Whatever the people of Iran want is what I want them to have." Such thinking makes democracy, which is but a procedure to safeguard man's natural rights, an empty principle. What that kind of statement lends itself to is the kind of "democracy" Iran already is -- where 51% percent enslaves the other 49%.

Stuff White People Like and Conservatives

Christian Lander of the popular blog, Stuff White People Like, came to speak at Pomona College on Sept. 17th.


According to Pomona's The Student Life, the first time Lander met a conservative was when he was 22 in Arizona. I wonder how many Pomona Students will graduate never having met conservatives, or gotten to know them outside of the caricatures they see on the Daily Show.

Friday, September 25, 2009

What is Deb Wood's Job? Whiteboard Police?

It's time to fire Debra Wood. It's unclear she does anything but expose Scripps College to a lawsuit for violating the Leonard Law. In this email, she threatens those of us who criticize her illegal and illiberal policies and wants us to report on one another's thoughts and writings. Creepy? You bet. But typical for Debra Wood. She's long become an embarrassment to Scripps College as she sees racism and sexism everywhere on campus. If Scripps is looking to downsize during the current financial slowdown, I think of a place to start.

But don't take my word for it. Read on.

From: Debra Wood [mailto:Dwood@ScrippsCollege.edu]

Last night between 10 PM and 12:15 AM someone scrawled a sexist comment on a student's write and wipe board. While a popular TV show uses this same scrawl, and some of you may not find it sexist or offensive because of its use, I ask you take a moment and think about.

This was done anonymously. The person or people involved may or may not know the occupant of the room, but her personal views and opinions are displayed on her door -- making it a logical conclusion that this was not a random act, but an act targeting her views.

We support free speech and the exchange of differing ideas and view points.

[CJ's note: You lie! Scripps doesn't support free exchange of differing ideas, at all.] Anonymous, rude writings on the property of another in the dark of night are not acts of free speech, but acts of stupidity, harassment, and cowardice. The scrawls are intended to hurt others and those that support them. It has a chilling effect on speech-- people are reluctant to speak out against this behavior for fear of retaliation, and it damages all of us.

[CJ's note: On the contrary, it is you that silences free speech by threatening students.]

All of our individual communities have lesbians and women and hateful acts toward lesbians and women at Scripps are hateful acts to lesbians and women at all the colleges, and everywhere else for that matter.

I especially urge the students of the five colleges to stand together and say this is not acceptable behavior. When someone laughs about it, criticizes the administrations for taking an active stand against these harassing and offensive acts, or even just brushes it off as nonsense, speak up for your friends, classmates, and colleagues.

[CJ's note: No thanks, I'll support students rights to think and say whatever they want on campus. It is, after all, the law.]

If you know who tell him/her/them to come forward and own their actions. There are many forums where one can discuss their view points in an adult manner. They must also take the consequences for their actions; we protect speech, but not anonymous, destructive and harassing actions. If they refuse to come forward, turn them in.

[CJ's note: "Turn them in"?! So you can do what? It is illegal for you to punish any student and encouraging students to turn one another in for harmless writing on a whiteboard would create a climate of fear on our campus. There's nothing "harassing" about a one time event. How is that harassing? The law is very clear that a "harassing" instance must occur multiple times.]

Anyone in need of support or wishing to discuss this incident is welcome and encouraged to contact the resource which best meets their needs. Resources include;

i.Dean of Students (909) 621-8277
ii.Residence Life staff (909) 621-8277 or (909) 607-4307 or (909) 607-8869
iii.SCORE staff (909) 607-8869
iv.MCAPS (Monsour) staff (909) 621-8202
v.Chaplains office (909) 621-8685
vi.OBSA staff (909) 621-8248
vii.CLSA staff (909) 621-8044
viii.Scripps Diversity Coordinating Committee co-chairs (Amy Marcus-Newhall, Marla Love)
ix. QRC staff

Anytime a community member becomes aware of a racist, sexist, heterosexist or homophobic, bias incident on our campus, a potential bias incident or hate crime, or any other type of crime they are urged to take appropriate action to combat the incident, These actions might include
+calling Campus Safety (ext.7200)
+photographing the incident
+identifying the perpetrator
+intervening in the moment, if it is safe to do so
+writing a letter or article for one of the student news publications, sponsoring, attending or participating in educations programming and encouraging your peers to do the same.

In accordance with the Communication Protocol for Bias Related Incidents for the Claremont Colleges a binder of incidents is kept in the Dean of Students Office, located in Balch Hall room 122, SARLO, 2nd floor Malott Commons or at SCORE, located across from Routt/Frankel Residence Hall. Persons wishing to review this binder may do so during regular office hours, Monday through Friday 8 AM to 5 PM

Thursday, September 24, 2009

HMC Alum Offers World Major Contribution: A Better Netflix Ranking System

Subject: HMC alum, Robert M. Bell, shares Netflix $1M prize!

Dear HMC Community Members,

Robert M. Bell (HMC '72, mathematics major) is featured prominently in today's New York Times. He was a member of the BellKor team that officially won the $1 million Netflix prize this morning.

The objective of the contest was to develop a software system that more accurately predicts the movies that customers would like to watch. The requirement was that the new system give a 10% improvement over the existing Netflix system.

This work is at the intersection of mathematics and computer science and uses techniques in machine learning among others. You can learn more about it at...

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/21/netflix-awards-1-million-prize-and-starts-a-new-contest/?hp

http://www.netflixprize.com/

Best regards,

Ran

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Pomona's Dean Poch on Admissions Standards

Still more hoops for students to go through. It looks like Pomona College's admissions department is looking for any and every reason to turn down students.


Because of the supposedly high number of "qualified" students applying, they are looking for other ways to discriminate among applicants. Why not just raise the bar?

Despite that trend, plenty of competitive colleges aren't shortening their essay requirements. Pomona College has optional essays that it encourages applicants to consider in its supplement to the Common Application.

Bruce Poch, vice president and dean of admissions at Pomona, said that the writing the college receives from the Common Application is "more polished" than the samples in response to the college's more informal questions, such as "Although it may appear to the contrary, we do know that people have a life beyond what they do to get into college. Tell us about an experience you've had outside of your formal classroom and extracurricular activities that was just plain fun and why."

Poch said that question "has proven to be a great 'reveal' because it clearly was written more informally and likely with some haste nearer the deadlines."

Pomona receives "periodic complaints from counselors that we are asking for too much work and should just stick to the Common App, but I still see the Common App as a common core and that each college may want something more particular to their community or mission," Poch said.

And he said there can be value in asking for more. "I'd personally rather ask for a bit more and get completed applications from those who were serious enough to follow through," he said.

Monday, September 21, 2009

The Mad Rush to See RuPaul Charles Before the Ath

A friend writes into ask why the popularity with RuPaul Charles's Ath talk. To which, I must respond: Ever been to a freak show? Try as you might, you can't look away.

The email that was sent out by the Ath fellows is below.

Dear Students,

Given the popularity of RuPaul Charles's appearance at the Athenaeum on Tuesday, September 29, we are pleased to inform you that the Ath will be accepting some additional reservations for the dinner prior to his talk.

Tomorrow, September 22, at 11:00 AM, the Athenaeum website www.cmc.edu/mmca/ will open up for more seating. If you were unable to sign up last night, please join us. Good luck!

If you are unable to attend the dinner, you may bring your 5C ID to attend the talk on a first-come, first-served basis. The talk will be broadcast to McKenna Auditorium where additional overflow seating will be available.

We look forward to seeing you there.

Sincerely,

Paige Costello '12 and David Nahmias '10
Woolley Athenaeum Fellows

Not Quite the "Head Start" You Had In Mind...

Every time I walk into the elevator I see a poster encouraging me to help change a child's life.


As I generally enjoy children, I'm intrigued. But when I see that the flyer is for Head Start, I'm more than a little dismayed.

The evidence against the efficacy of Head Start is overwhelming. A large body of research indicates that Head Start does boost short term academic benefits, but that these benefits fade by the second or third grade. Moreover, a review of this research -- all told more than 200 studies -- undertaken by the Department of Health and Human Services, concluded that there was no lasting academic advantage to participating in Head Start. This is all the more damning because Head Start is administered by the Department of Health and Human Services! The waste of billions of dollars to the taxpayer led Rhode Island governor, Donald Carcieri, to call Head Start "a dismal failure" and that it is "the biggest waste of federal money." Although he stopped short of calling for it to be defunded -- in part, due to the constant attacks he faces by the public sector unions -- Carcieri stood by his statement.

Worse yet, these resources are not only being entirely wasted, they are being fraudulently misused. Head Start remains, according to the GAO, one of the most corrupt and fraudulent government program in the country. In New York, a Head Start director embezzled a quarter million in finds in 1999 to subsidize a film studio, recording company, and a clothing business. In Cleveland, faced with flagging enrollment in Head Start -- which would normally be a good thing, no? -- the 1997 class roster was padded with more than 60 fake-names, all of which helped bring in an additional $250,000 in extra state and federal funding. There are numerous instances that the GAO has uncovered:
Some of the most alarming cases included: the indictment of both a Maryland Head Start director on charges that she stole $335,777 and a South Dakota woman for embezzling $185, 000 from a Head Start service provider; and a New Mexico program suspected of defrauding the program of $526,000. The latter program received a $2 million federal grant while the fraud case was still pending. While not listed in the report, audits have revealed that the current chief of the federal Head Start program, Windy Hill, mismanaged $140,000 and improperly received $30,000 in bonuses and perquisites while she was the executive director of Texas Head Start.

If Congress is serious about accountability for Head Start—a $7 billion program—they need to overhaul the program entirely,” Schatz said. “DHS has squandered countless opportunities to fulfill its oversight duties; it is seemingly incapable of reconciling the shocking improprieties present at all levels of this program. The time has come for Congress to intervene, answer to taxpayers, restructure this program, and ensure there is no more corruption.”
This, I'm afraid, is a theme of the Left's. For all the environmental left's rhetoric about waste, the administrative left is built on the premise of waste being a necessary byproduct of the welfare state. A competitive system of education would, by definition, reduce waste. Unfortunately for the Head Start employees, it would put them out of a job.

President Pamela Gann, for her part, has said in speeches that she would like to see students go out into the nonprofit world. I submit to you that she has a responsibility to vet these nonprofits before they come on campus. But that responsibility doesn't end with President Gann. It is incumbent upon all of us to look into and investigate the claims made by groups trying to solicit student help or labor.

A Few Thoughts on Peak Oil and Last Week's Talk at the Athenaeum

I knew right from the get go that Dr. Rutledge's talk wasn't going to be as measured as I would have liked. How could he, if he were the guest of the Roberts Environmental Center? Given the mission of that institute, he almost has to give us a Malthusian prediction of resource exhaustion.

And true to my dismay, his regressions were more just creative statistical games, rather than actual models that predicted the likelihood of oil prices and reserves. It seems perfectly intuitive to suppose that reserve use follows a natural distribution, but unfortunately for Rutledge, it is probably wrong. His argument has several flaws, not the least of which is that his models fail to consider the effect technology has upon extraction.

Indeed, there has been an explosion of technology and research that has helped to accelerate and efficiently extract oil from known reserves. So while reserves may be fixed, innovation is decidedly not.

How else to explain the extraction of oil from deep in the Siberian tundra or miles down through the ocean crust? Think about it. Much of the world's oil reserves are on land The world's oceans haven't even begun to be probed for oil reserves. This was a point brought home to me when, in high school, my team competed in designing and developing robotic submarines for two consecutive years. At the international competition in Houston, the firms most interested in giving us internships were oil companies for the simple reason that robotic submarines were needed to identify and map potential reserves.

But that technology problem is not the least of the problems. The elephant in the room was a failure to look at the effects of regulation and law in supposedly exhausting reserves.

There's little evidence that the U.S. actually reached "peak oil" in the 1970s or that Britain reached "peak coal" in the 1980s, as Rutledge claimed, but rather that it became extremely uneconomical -- or politically difficult -- for firms or nations to extract coal or oil domestically.

Thatcher denationalized the coal mines because they were economical and because there existed better and cheaper sources of coal abroad. The net effect of environmental regulations and lawsuits have had much the same effect in the U.S. with respect to our oil and gas reserves. (Note, the moratorium on drilling in federal lands, for one.)

Indeed, many of the exhausted reserves that Rutledge cites are only counted as exhausted because the owners reduced production to deal with costs. But, as the price of oil or coal increases, it suddenly becomes a lot more economical to renew operations. That happened in California with the run up in oil prices.

Rutledge's solution to deal with the phantom problem of peak oil/coal, simply isn't a solution at all. Rutledge approvingly cited Jim Hansen of NASA who argues that we should no longer build new coal plants. To do such a thing would have the effect of increasing Americans' fuel bills, with little actual effect on either so-called global warming or world coal reserves. While there may be an incentive to invest in new technology with a moratorium on coal fire plants, they could just as easily be an aggressive lobbying campaign to allow firms to continue as usual.

Interestingly, the Russians, one of the country's that Rutledge excluded from his Power Point presentation, don't buy Rutledge's conclusions about peak oil. I quote from a recent article on their expanding reserves.

Today, Russians laugh at our peak oil theories as they explore, and find, the bounty in the bowels of the Earth. Russia’s reserves have been climbing steadily — according to BP’s annual survey, they stood at 45 billion barrels in 2001, 69 billion barrels in 2004, and 80 billion barrels of late, making Russia an oil superpower that this year produced more oil than Saudi Arabia. Some oil auditing firms estimate Russia’s reserves at up to 200 billion barrels. Despite Russia’s success in exploration, most of those in the west who have known about the Russian-Ukrainian theories have dismissed them as beyond the Pale. This week, the Russian Pale can be found awfully close to home.

In a study published in Nature Geoscience, researchers from the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Sweden and the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington joined colleagues at the Lomonosov Moscow State Academy of Fine Chemical Technology in publishing evidence that hydrocarbons can be produced 40 to 95 miles beneath the surface of the Earth. At these depths — in what’s known as Earth’s Upper Mantle — high temperatures and intense pressures combine to generate hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbons then migrate toward the surface of the Earth through fissures in the Earth’s crust, sometimes feeding existing pools of oil, sometimes creating entirely new ones. According to Sweden’s Royal Institute, “fossils of animals and plants are not necessary to generate raw oil and natural gas. This result is extremely radical as it means that it will be much easier to find these energy sources and that they may be located all over the world.”

The Institute’s lead author, Vladimir Kutcherov, Professor at the KTH Department of Energy Technology, is even more brash at the implications of his findings: “With the help of our research we even know where oil could be found in Sweden!” he delights. Kutcherov’s technique involves dividing the world into a fine-meshed grid that maps cracks (or migration channels) under the Earth’s crust, through which the hydrocarbons can bubble up to the surface. His advice: Drill where the cracks meet. Doing this, he predicts, will dramatically reduce the likelihood of dry wells. Kutcherov expects the success rate of drillers to more than triple, from 20% to 70%, saving billions in exploration costs while opening up vast new areas of the planet — most of which has never been deemed to have promise — to exploration.

The Nature study follows Kutcherov’s previous work, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, that created hydrocarbons out of water, calcium carbonate and iron — products in the Earth’s mantle. By superheating his ingredients in a pressure chamber at 30,000 times atmospheric pressure, simulating the conditions in the Earth’s mantle, Kutcherov’s alchemy converted 1.5% of his concoction into hydrocarbons — gases such as methane as well as components of heavier oils. The implication of this research, which suggests that hydrocarbons are continuously generated through natural processes? Petroleum is a sustainable resource that will last as long as Planet Earth.

Sunday, September 20, 2009

Fancy That: The Chinese Don't Want an Interventionist Leader...

Professor Minxin Pei was quoted in an NPR article regarding four upcoming before the United Nations. Here is what he had to say.

Minxin Pei, a professor of government at Claremont McKenna College in California, does not expect Hu to pursue a particularly high profile or make any grand gestures "The Chinese leadership is accustomed to maintaining a low profile," he says. "Any Chinese leader who wants to grab the international limelight is vulnerable to criticism at home for committing China to expensive international obligations."

It's also a tough time for Hu to be away from home. Ethnic unrest has been simmering in parts of China, and leaders are busy making preparations for the upcoming celebrations marking the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China on Oct. 1.

"If he had a choice, he would probably have skipped the G-20," Pei says. "He would love to have spent time at home to make sure the celebratory activities go forward without a hitch."

If only our president showed that reluctance to go abroad and commit us to expensive obligations... Were that it were so.

I have my doubts about how much that might actually be true -- are not the Chinese, as Dambisa Moyo points out in Dead Aid, buying up resources in Africa? -- but still, it'd be nice to think that at least one country in the planet was more concerned with growing its own economy than on posturing on the world stage.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Now That a CMCer Runs the Millennium Development Corporation, Let's Hope He Shuts It Down

Congrats to Daniel Yohannes '76 for being named the CEO of the Millennium Development Corporation by the Obama Administration yesterday. The Millennium Development is a corporation run by the United States government that seeks to implement the Millennium Development Goals by 2015. The hope is to make the world free from poverty, misery, and illiberalism by 2015. (Yeah, I'm also curious as to why the U.S. government owns a corporation, but hey, didn't you get the memo? We're all socialists now...)


Reportedly, Mr. Yohannes came to America from Ethiopia with $150 in his pocket, so presumably he knows a thing or two about eradicating poverty, having done it so successfully with himself. According to public records, he gave over $27,000 this past election cycle to Democrats. Anyone with that kind of cash to spend on a political race certainly can lay claim to having made it in America.

But if you've actually studied the Millennium Development Goals, you'll be a little more suspicious that a worldwide intergovernmental can actually end poverty, notwithstanding the promises of charlatans like Bono and Jeffrey Sachs.

Unsurprisingly, the aid agencies are failing to succeed in addressing any of the Millennium Development Goals. We're usually told that the reason development is slow is lack of knowledge, but actually, we've known since at least 1938 of the problems facing Africa and the development world. Just compare the language of a report from the 30's to one of the Millennium Development Project reports. The reason Africa's been slow to execute isn't a lack of knowledge; it's a lack of useful knowledge, brought to bear through markets.

Worse yet, much of the reason the Development Goals have failed is that they fail to specialize. Here's how economist Bill Easterly describes that problem.
Economists are often congratulated for their impressive grasp of the obvious. Yet if this principle [of gains from specialization] is so obvious, why is it routinely violated in the aid world? It’s gotten worse with the Millennium Development Goals. Each aid organization tries to meet all MDGs and each fails to specialize. Therefore some aid agencies are forced to supply things they are bad at – the equivalent of Gates’ [producing] music videos – for which there is no demand.

UNICEF is working on swine flu, the traditional province of WHO, who is distracted by trying to do development research, which is the traditional specialty of the World Bank, who is in turn distracted by a new emphasis on children, which is the strength of – just to complete the circle – UNICEF.

Even very small aid agencies fail to specialize – Luxembourg’s $141 million aid budget was divided among 30 different sectors (out of a possible 37). The tiny Luxembourg budget also went to 87 different countries.

With high overhead costs for each separate activity for each country, the ratio of overhead costs to funds for the activity gets extremely high, sometimes over 100 percent. UNDP has one of the very LEAST specialized aid budgets by country and by sector, and it actually does have a ratio of overhead costs to aid disbursed of 129%.

Yohannes came to America, fleeing one of most socialistic and repressive regimes. His life story and success in the banking industry are testaments to all that liberalized markets offer. So why then does he want to run an organization that believes it can ignore Hayek's "fatal conceit" and centrally plan for people far, far away when he saw the failure of a government that tried to do that for people nearby?

If Yohannes were serious about truly saving Africa or the rest of the developing world, he'd encourage the rest of the world to scale back-- or even eliminate-- its aid projects and start trading with a newly liberalizing continent. It worked for Asia. Why not Africa?

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Memo from the Athenaeum: Gay Activism Yes; Open Inquiry, No

I regret to inform my readers that the Athenaeum under its two Ath Fellows has decided more to engage in activism, at the expense of informed, reason dialogue. Such activism on behalf of a partisan agenda has no place at the Athenaeum where frank discussion ought to be encouraged. Instead, in an email from the Ath fellows, I'm told of a speakers series titled, "Marching toward Equality."

So shame on the Ath for only inviting one side of a "divisive" issue to the table. The Ath is, after all, a public good and it only succeeds at its mission when it brings all people to the table. Such was its mission and I wonder if it can long survive such a mission under its current trajectory. That it brought three speakers to speak on so-called on only one side of gay issues is troubling indeed. And while homosexual equality may be a divisive topic in the nation as a whole, it is certainly not one at the Claremont Colleges where I would estimate that most Claremont students voted against Proposition 8.

There were many speaker series it could have offered if it were seeking to mark historic events and the Stonewill Inn episode -- which occurred in 1969, not 1979 as the letter claims -- does not strike me as the most pressing one for conversation and reflection. How about instead a conversation about Chinese human rights twenty years after the massacre of Chinese students at Tienanmen Square? Or, say, a conversation about the agitation and recognition of Solidarity in Poland twenty years later? Or a frank conversation about the would be rainbow republic fifteen years after the end of apartheid? Surely these events warrant at least a speaker.

Of course there are many that think that being opposed to what is currently known as the gay liberation movement is tantamount to bigotry -- a charge and an accusation I fully reject.
Indeed, I have made the case here and elsewhere that in order for the Republican party to be a pro-life party, it needs to be the party of gay adoption and, so as not to discriminate against the children of those gay couples by taxing their parents as individuals, eventually of some kind of tax benefit for any two people living together. I strongly support homosexuals serving openly in the U.S. military, especially in this time of war. I tend to take the Chris Rock view on that and I find it absolutely a stain on this country's honor that we allow Israeli, Brits, and others, who allow

The Ath has brought many, many speakers in favor of supposed homosexual equality, including a CMCer military man who opposed "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." It has brought noted gay activist, Andrew Sullivan, to the Athenaeum twice in the past four years.

And certainly we can do better than the gays we are bringing to the Athenaeum, Cleve Jones is a member of the group, UNITE HERE!, which seeks to align the gay community with organized labor. Mr. Jones will be speaking on homosexual marriage, a cause he believes in and will be leading a march on Washington to effect that end. Of course, if you wanted to encourage the Ath to bring someone who orchestrated that massive protest against Obama, you won't get a receptive response.

And don't get me started on RuPaul Charles.

I will be there to challenge politely, but firmly, those speakers and I'll have something on Mr. Daniel Choi later.

The Activist Ath is At It Again...

In June 1979, a police raid at The Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York, prompted riots across the country and ignited the so-called gay rights movement. Forty years later, the question of what exactly “gay rights” entail remains a divisive issue, generating fierce internal debate even within the Republican and Democratic parties. The Marian Miner Cook Athenaeum is pleased to announce a series – Moving Towards Equality: Forty Years since Stonewall – looking at the accomplishments of the gay rights movement and the challenges ahead.

Guest speakers on this series include RuPaul Charles, an internationally renowned singer-songwriter; Cleve Jones, the designer of the AIDS/Names Quilt and the organizer of the upcoming National Equality March in Washington; and Dan Choi, an Iraq War veteran who is challenging the Don't Ask/Don't Tell policy.

The Next Fortnightly will appear in your email this weekend. We hope you will join us for these and other speakers throughout the semester.

See you at the Ath!


Paige Costello and David Nahmias

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Gann Promotes "Sustainability" Fad, Among Others

Dear CMC Students,

CMC is among the premier liberal arts colleges in the world, and we are poised to attain even greater distinction. To continue our positive trajectory, a well envisioned and executed strategic plan is a critical need for the Board of Trustees, the President and senior administrative leadership, the faculty, students, and alumni.


In 2002, the College established a strategic plan to help guide us over the ensuing decade. In that plan, we solidified our mission and the teacher-scholar model, and identified top priorities for Admission and Financial Aid, Faculty, Curriculum, Institutes, Student Life, Alumni Affairs, Public Affairs, Financial Planning and Human Resources, and various aspects of the College’s Master Plan, along with key indicators by which to measure our progress. I am pleased to say that, in following our plan, we have made significant strides. For example, our admissions rate has fallen from 25% in 2002, to 16% in 2009, establishing CMC among the top five most selective national liberal arts colleges, and as provided for in the plan, we have reduced the number of in-state students to around 35%, and increased our international enrollments substantially. Our graduation rate has increased to 94%. Our faculty recruiting has been extremely robust and successful, and we continue to make progress in many other areas.


The Board of Trustees and I believe that our 2002 strategic plan has served us well, but now it is time to review, update, and refresh our overall plan to guide us as we move into the next five years and beyond. In this updating process, we ought to examine and hone certain areas that we need to adapt to the changing environment for our students and our financial sources. This effort would not revisit, however, essential characteristics surrounding key aspects of the College, such as: our mission; CMC as a residential –student centered College; our teacher-scholar model for faculty; the balance across various aspects of the College; and our commitment to the consortium.

At its May 2009 meeting, the Board of Trustees approved proceeding with updating and refreshing our plan, and also approved a number of areas to review in this process. These include:



1. Enrollment Growth in Claremont

2. Admission and Financial Aid

3. Selected Topics in Academic Affairs as it Relates to the Faculty and the Curriculum

4. Master Planning of the Campus

5. Financial Planning

6. The Role of Athletics at the College

7. Globalization

8. Sustainability



The strategic planning work will be conducted through existing standing committees of the faculty and the Board of Trustees; therefore, we will not establish a separate set of strategic planning committees. Also, the timeline to complete the work is this academic year, with the Board’s plan to approve the new strategic plan at its May 2010 meeting.

I already appreciate the involvement of students and staff in our master planning efforts to date. As our strategic planning work continues, I will provide updates on our progress during this academic year.

Sincerely,

Pamela B. Gann

President

Eating Clubs at CMC?

Dear Charles,


It seems that the campus tray less system is here to stay. It is a form of artificial rationing. i PROPOSE A NEW EATING CLUB/SOCIETY MODELED AFTER THE FAMOUS EATING CLUBS OF HARVARD AND PRINCETON ND YALE. The name should be the" clean plate society." Its motto should be take only what you eat; eat all you take.After all you are what you eat! This should be printed on the back and top of each members' plastic{ recyclable of course- made of 100% reclaimed plastic perhaps from the dash boards of suvs or bmws} or preferably wooden naturally biodegradeable made from the discarded planking of the yachts of the pater familias. As grown ups they should monitor the behavior of their members and adhere to the lean Plate creed" waste want want not"[Ben Franklin speaking as Poore Richard}/remember the starving armenians[insert starving group du jour here} The society should hold menue tastings to ascertain what delectibles they should appropriately load onto their permanent re useable recycled trays. In the east these trays could also be used for sledding boogie boarding in the skimmable west.. People who waste food should be stripped of their treays in a publice manner in the dining halls. Work study should be encouraged to offer jobs to the food waste monitors. Make the biogas bio fuels group feel the lack of feed stock. Make em scream. Cut down so much on food consumption that the producers beg you to eat/waste more. ou get my drift. Love the chief gourmnde

Drinking Culture May Change Indefinitely Overnight

Stark,

Cameron and I went to a meeting with the Dean of Students this morning and there are several things we want to talk/warn you about regarding alcohol on campus. Last weekend was too crazy and has threatened to change the alcohol policy as we know it. For privacy reasons we are unable to speak of the specifics of one particular event, but suffice it to say CMC could have resulted in an indefinitely dry campus over night.

As of now, here are the ways we can maintain our alcohol policy while being responsible:

1. Put it in a red cup. If it’s not in a red cup, it will be confiscated.

2. No glass. If you break glass at a party there is a $200 fine.

3. If you’re in trouble or concerned, don’t be afraid to call one of the RAs on duty.

4. If you choose to drink, do so within your limits.

5. If it’s a CMC only party, all other students (and off-campus guests) will be asked to leave.


CMC Public Alcohol Policy: Alcoholic beverages may be served and consumed only at private events limited to members of the College community and their invited guests. Alcoholic beverages may not be served or consumed at events open to the public, such as intercollegiate athletic contests, or outside the confines of a registered and fenced party area. (Guide to Student Life page 32)

We are sorry that this email may sound harsh but without basic adherence to the policies, the administration will change many of the privileges we enjoy at CMC.

If you have any questions regarding this email or anything else, please come visit one of us. Our doors are always open.

We hope your third week is going well!

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Student Anti-ACORN Sting in San Bernardino Will Help Bring It Down

James O'Keefe is a friend of David Daleiden''s (CMC'11). O'Keefe and Hannah Giles have been going coast to coast documenting instances of ACORN employees willingly giving advice on how to avoid paying taxes and shielding a would be pimp (running for congress) and a prostitutent from the watchful eye of the law. They've brought their investigation to New York City, Washington D.C., and Baltimore.


The Senate has already voted to cut off all federal government funding of ACORN and the Census Bureau has cut off all times with them.

Today, James's operation, Veritas Visuals, released the first part of a two part clip showing corruption in ACORN's nearby office in San Bernardino County. On camera, the ACORN worker admits to being an ex-prostitute, helps O'Keefe and Giles hide their operation, and admits to murdering her ex-husband. Here's the clip.

On College Jeopardy? We Shall See...

I got a call back to audition for College Jeopardy this November 8th. If you have advice, I welcome it.

I took the test and apparently, this is the final hoop to jump through. I have to look telegenic, sporty, and fun. Remember, it's not like a test. It's televison and so I have to be entertaining.

To add to it, I think this is the year for a CMC student to get on college jeopardy, as Dan Pawson CMC '03, won the Tournament of Champions this past year.

I'm considering buying a buzzer to practice and I have already begun compiling all of the College Jeopardy questions from j-archive to study better.

To say this is exciting would be an understatement. Being on Jeopardy has been a dream of mine since I was a little kid. (When I was about four, I used to dance, like Elvis, whenever the theme song came on for Final Jeopardy.)

Wish me luck!

Monday, September 14, 2009

LA Times Published Story on Pomona's Tray-liban: My Thoughts to Come

All you can carry: College cafeterias go trayless

Despite some students' complaints about the inconvenience, more schools cut down on food and energy costs with a new policy.

By Larry Gordon

September 14, 2009


Derek Owens performs a nifty and somewhat precarious balancing act when he gets his meals at Pomona College.

At lunch one recent day, the freshman from Oregon held a plate of nachos and beans in one hand. In the other, he stacked a serving of pizza and breadstick on top of a fruit juice cup. With silverware deftly added to the pile, he made it to his table without spilling a drop.

Call it eco-dining, or another sign of tough economic times in American academia. Pomona this fall joined a growing number of colleges in California and across the nation that have eliminated cafeteria trays in an effort to reduce food waste, cut water usage and save on energy bills.

Students' reaction has been mixed, but Owens and others say they are adapting for the sake of the environment, their schools' budgets and their own waistlines. If they can't carry all the food they want in their first trip to the serving stations, they say, they will make one or two more. And if they wind up with fewer second helpings of granola or ice cream, so be it.

"It's definitely difficult and a little bit inconvenient," Owens said amid the hubbub of Pomona's Gothic-style Frary Dining Hall. "But I like the intentions. The intentions are good, to be more aware of the environment and all that. So it's a small sacrifice to make."

The trayless college cafeteria is a growing trend, spreading from the Northeast and West Coast to the Midwest and South, said Joseph Spina, executive director of the National Assn. of College and University Food Services. Because it combines business savings with students' interest in sustainability, the change is viewed as a "win-win," he said.

His group does not have a definitive list of trayless schools, but food service companies report that many are shedding the plastic trays. Aramark Higher Education estimates that 60% of the 600 campuses it serves are trayless, and Sodexo Inc., which works at a similar number of schools, says about 40% have switched.

In California, no-tray schools include UC Irvine, UC Riverside, UC Santa Cruz, San Diego State, Loyola Marymount University and all five undergraduate campuses in the Claremont Colleges consortium to which Pomona College belongs. UCLA also expects to be trayless in at least two of its four big student dining halls this fall.

Elsewhere, the University of Minnesota, the University of Connecticut, Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., and Middlebury College in Vermont have joined the movement.

Criticism -- and grumbling among students about economic goals hiding behind political correctness -- has triggered reversals of the policy at some schools.

Student complaints about inconvenience prompted Northern Michigan University to abandon its plan to eliminate trays, at least for now.

Michigan students, along with those in other snow states, often turn their trays into makeshift sleds -- a time-honored tradition. School officials said that if they do make the switch next year, they might give the trays to students, expecting that many will be used for that purpose.

Many colleges offer dining plans that allow students to eat all they want at any meal; trayless schools typically maintain that tradition, although diners may not be able to carry all their food at once. Those schools report decreases of as much as 30% in food waste. With no trays to wash, they reduce water and energy use too.

Paul Melchior, director of dining services at San Diego State, said its annual food costs have been reduced about 2%, or $65,000, since the switch two years ago. He said the savings have gone mainly toward improved menus, including more fresh fish, prime rib and other upgraded items.

The change has also sped up the serving process, Melchior said. "Now they make a conscious choice of whether to go to that station and get that or not," he said. "So the lines are significantly less."

At UC Santa Cruz, which switched last year, about $100,000 in annual savings has helped moderate increases in students' board plan fees, said Scott Berlin, director of dining and hospitality services.

Berlin cited a few minor downsides, including tables that need to be cleaned more often because of crumbs and scraps that otherwise would have fallen on trays, and students grousing about extra trips through the line. "Anything with sustainability and recycling requires you to do something extra and something more," he said.

Miriam Feldblum, vice president and dean of students at Pomona College, said her campus and its food service contractor, Sodexo, experimented with "Trayless Tuesdays" last year and decided to go with it full time after positive feedback and changes in dining habits.

"When you ask people, 'How often do you put something on your tray that you wind up not eating?' they'll think about it and say, 'Quite often,' " she said. "It's rare someone will say, 'I eat everything on my tray.' "

At Frary Dining Hall, whose arches, wood paneling and chandeliers provide a "Harry Potter"-like atmosphere, Pomona junior Dylan O'Shea said the lack of trays causes him to "spill a fair share of food because I'm carrying too much stuff in one hand."

So to cut down on the number of plates he was juggling on a recent afternoon, the biology major from Seattle piled six plums around his burritos and was considering a return trip to the serving stations for more grub. But he said he can live trayless: "Obviously, there are a lot of benefits because of the reduced waste."

On the other hand, neuroscience major Clay Taylor supports the general concept of sustainability but said he considers the trayless change just a "trendy thing" to make the college appear environmentally conscious. The junior from Richmond, Va., said he wondered whether water was actually being saved, with students using more plates and tables needing extra cleaning.

In addition, Taylor said, he wasn't pleased about having to make so many extra trips to get food: "The more time I spend on lunch, the less time I spend studying."

larry.gordon@latimes.com

Sunday, September 13, 2009

I'm Predicting More than a Thirty Seat Pick Up for Republicans in 2010 Elections

Professor John J. Pitney Jr. was quoted in The Associated Press as saying the following:

“When you have big sweeps as Democrats did in 2006 and 2008, inevitably some weak candidates get elected. And when the environment gets even moderately challenging, a number of them are going to lose,” said Jack Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College in California.
I'm going to make a bold prediction here. I'm predicting the Democratic Party will lose more than thirty seats in the 2010 elections.

I would caution against worrying too much about national Republican efforts at fund raising. The party has always done best when it has favored a decentralized, localized campaign. Remember what the famous Democrat Tip O'Neil once said that all politics is local.

Constituents feel the effects of this recession on their livelihoods in a bad way and they fear that the worst is yet to come.

I Would Have Taken Him Aside, Too

TSA Defends Holding Student With Arabic Flash Cards at Philadelphia Airport

Saturday , September 12, 2009


The Transportation Security Administration is defending its treatment of a California college student who was detained at the Philadelphia airport after Arabic flash cards were found in his backpack.

Nick George, a senior at Pomona College, told a Philadelphia Daily News columnist that the stereo speakers he was carrying in his bag on Aug. 29 led TSA workers to pull him out of the metal detector line and search him.

When they found 200 Arabic/English flash cards in his carry-on, they escorted him to another screening area and questioned him for about 45 minutes, he said.

Suspicions may have been raised because his passport had stamps from Jordan, where he'd studied abroad, and from his trips to Egypt and the Sudan, the News reported. It didn't help that "terrorist" and "explosion" were among the words on his flash cards — which George says he was using to help him understand Al Jazeera TV.

But George believes things got out of hand when, he says, a Philadelphia police officer put handcuffs on him and took him to the airport holding cell for several hours. He was released after another round of questioning from the FBI, he told the Daily News.

He missed his flight and was issued a new ticket for a departure the next day.

The TSA denies George's version of events, explaining that he was flagged for questioning even before he was in the security line because officials thought he was acting suspiciously.

TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis told the Daily News that George caught the attention of the agency's behavioral specialists, who are on the lookout for "involuntary physical and physiological reactions that people exhibit in response to a fear of being discovered."

The report filed on the incident suggests that George's "behavior escalated to a point where our officers deemed it necessary to contact the Philadelphia Police Department," Davis said.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Adam Kokesh for Congress?


Adam Kokesh CMC '05 is gathering lots of support for his congressional bid to unseat Democrat Ben Ray Lujan.

He's raised more than $75,000 for the Republican party primary and hopes to make $100,000 by September 30th. He's already broken a few fundraising records. They'll be a money bomb then. I'll be participating. It's time to put another CMCer in Congress.

Kokesh is running as a principled Constitutionalist. I think his politics would best be summed up as a Ron Paul Republican.

Friday, September 11, 2009

The Takeout Box Swindle and the Latest Bunk in Trayless Dining

The filthiness of the takeout boxes is the latest story to be told about the politicization of our food choices.

At Collins, they are now reusing takeout boxes and giving them back to students. Currently, they charge 50 cents per takeout box and now, if you return your takeout box, they will simply rinse them out and sell them again.

I doubt very much that the cost of washing these takeout boxes was factored into this supposedly waste reducing policy. Further, I've washed a few things in my time. Wouldn't it be easier to wash out and reuse plastic trays (particularly when they are already purchased) than to rewash and reuse styrofoam takeout boxes. What's worse is that students don't know they are getting takeout boxes that others have already been eaten on!

There have got to be better ways to reduce waste. One such way is to let students take the food that they would otherwise waste out of the dining hall, rather than forcing them to get rid of it.

The more I look into the ban on trayless dining that has sweeped the campus, the more suspicious the motivations I see underlying it. This propaganda piece in favor of trayless dining really makes me wonder if the real reason Aramark and Bon Appetit favor it is that it helps their bottom line.

Obviously getting rid of trays would reduce waste. So too would eliminating plates.

Now I'm off the meal plan and so there's a limited effect that I can have on this, but I pledge that everytime I eat in any of the dining halls I'm going to be leaving my plate at my seat until the policy is changed.

Remembering 9-11 Eight Years Later

I do not like to talk about 9-11. I perceive what Peggy Noonan talked about in today's Wall Street Journal is about right.


We, who were in middle school, do not talk about 9-11. It is one of those shared things of which we do not speak because for many of us it marked the end of something entirely -- childhood. Many people compare this day to our generation's Kennedy assassination or Pearl Harbor, but I would disagree. It was conceivable at the time that there would be a new president after Kennedy and there would be an end to the war with Japan. There really is no end to this war because in all likelihood there was no beginning. Savages and civilized peoples have always been at war. The only problem is that civilization has afforded savages all the tools and weapons of modernity.

There was some kind of powerless that befell lots of adults that day and in the weeks subsequent. As a newspaper boy, I noticed that more and more of my customers sat on the porch waiting for the news to arrive. Everyone -- from high school kids to ninety year old retired firemen -- seemed to be giving themselves a crash course on Osama bin Laden, Afghanistan, and Islam.

Many of my friends remember this time as one of the few that they ever saw their parents cry. Coming home on that autumn day a few days after school had started, you could sense that this year and all of the years that would come after it would be different.

I don't remember much of what my parents said that day. I remember my Mom crying and going to bed early and my dad coming home late from work, telling me in that stern, sad voice he uses only when he wants me to grasp the way the world really works. It's a tone his voice takes only when our family experiences tragedy.

He tried to talk to me and told me that this likely meant that the country was at war and that this would be a big war. He hugged me, again another rare event and he asked me to help explain things to my siblings and not to be too sad. I told him I would.

Time and again, friends have described 9-11 as a bubble popping event. But it was no such things for me. As a kid with a mom who had had cancer and would have it again, I knew that people were mortal and that random, awful, things happen to good people everyday and that there wasn't much you could do about it. It was one of those moments where I have been grateful that my parents didn't have cable and so the images, broadcast over and over again, could only be described on the radio.

But if it was a bubble popping event, it wasn't immediately clear that many kids had understood it as such. Over the next few days, occasionally, a tear or two would fall from the corner of my eye, but the only girl who was crying was my friend, Jill Beach who I, sitting as I did near the tissue box, gave tissues to. Jill was also a kid who had lived outside of the bubble. Ever since she was a young kid, she suffered from a rare childhood cancer that was never fully beaten back. (In the end, she lost that battle.) And though I knew that I could never feel what Jill was feeling, I often looked to her as a kind of barometer of when things were bad. Every indication was that that they were.

I think back to that day everytime I leave Boston for Los Angeles. Both American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 originated in Boston and the flight between LA and Boston is one I often take.

Everytime I walk into Logan Airport and stare up at the camera, like Mohammed Atta, I cannot help but feel a great chill come over me. When I was younger, I was always excited to go traveling, but now I try to stay up the entire night beforehand so that I am too tired to let my nerves get the better of me. (I suspect that once I turn 21, I'll turn to other forms of relaxation.)

I look up at the camera that overlooks the terminal each time and wonder if this'll be the last flight I take. And though I am not very religious, I say a prayer, "Lord, give me the strength to do what I must, should evil be calling."

We're told that New Yorkers have gotten a lot more vigilant about the threats to their security and rightly so, but still, I sometimes wonder if the residents of the city I love have gotten the message. And this video, makes me inclined to think that at least some of them have forgotten.

Last time I was in Boston to mark 9-11, I went to Daniel Lewin Square where I laid some flowers. Daniel M. Lewin was an American-born Israeli entrepreneur who, a 2002 FAA memo suggests, was killed by hijacker Satam al-Suqami, after he tried to foil their hijacking. While a lot of people like the narrative of United 93, I've always found the story of Daniel Lewin to be especially powerful. It says something profound about us that the first person to resist was an Israeli.

In truth, what 9-11 demonstrates to me is that, like the Israelis, everyone of us is a target. We are hated not for who we are, but from where we happen to live. From Christine Hanson, a 2-year old of Groton, Mass, to 85 year-old Robert Grant North, of Lubec Maine and all 2994 other fatalities, we are all targets and the moment we forget, they'll be another 9-11.

FIRE Smacks Deb Wood for Her Lack of Tolerance for "Stupid Drunks"

The Torch, the blog of The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), points out that this Deb Wood incident is just one of the many, many instances where we have tolerance for me, but not for thee. Here's what Adam Kissel writes, in part,

That's right, all this education about stereotyping and inclusiveness and diversity has not kept Debra Wood from using a slur against people who engage in "substantial drinking." Wood has declared to everyone at the Claremont Colleges that it is OK to stereotype such people as "stupid drunks." Of course, calling someone a "stupid drunk" is protected speech, especially since it's usually just a matter of opinion. But it shows that Debra Wood really has learned nothing about being "supportive" and "inclusive" of people who engage in substantial drinking.

In all seriousness, the Claremont Colleges are out of control. I still don't understand what is supposed to be the "impact" of "Hillary is a foxy lesbian." If you want any evidence that political correctness is alive and well, just go to Claremont, where they notify Campus Safety and send consortium-wide e-mails whenever some utterance might seem the slightest bit offensive to anybody. Public opprobrium is the best way to deal with offensive or racist speech, but Claremont's policy is well into the realm of the ridiculous. The infantilization of students is no way to prepare them to participate as adults in a free society.

The National Association of Scholars Mentions Claremont Conservative in the Trayless Debate

The Claremont Conservative was mentioned on the website of the National Association of Scholars when I wrote something against the tray bans on campus. They wrote a lengthy and good article against tray bans. They argue that the real reason we have had trays banned is to inconvenience us into supporting bogus politics. Here are a few mentions.
That third rationale, “social awareness,” is the most important goal. Like the campus-driven movement to ban bottled water, trayless dining is mostly symbolic. Those who seek to use higher education as an incubator for the sustainability movement know that to transform people’s mindsets, they need only require small changes in everyday habits. When we are confronted with trivial daily lifestyle choices, we are constantly reminded of how we’ve been told we ought to behave.

Leaders of other activist movements have used this technique before. Feminists succeeded in getting us all to stop and worry over titles and third person pronouns (Is it ‘he or she’? Mailperson? Ms.?). They also achieved the substitution of the word gender for sex, signifying that “sexual identity” is socially constructed, not biologically assigned.

In the same way, when college students juggle plates and cups and silverware on their way through the cafeteria, they are obliged to think about sustainability every day at every meal. Sustainability advocates know that trayless dining is not going to change the world; they achieve victory simply by getting inside people’s heads.

Because sustainability initiatives seem so trivial, most people don’t think it is harmless, as illustrated by one person’s response to our list of ten reasons to oppose the campus sustainability movement:

I am unconvinced...As a counterexample, see the University of Chicago’s page on sustainability on campus: http://sustainability.uchicago.edu/. There’s nothing more controversial than recycling batteries and minimizing the use of leaf blowers.

Yes, Chicago’s webpage, with an eco-tip of the month and information about this year’s Earth Week, seems perfectly inoffensive. And many sustainability programs arestrictly concerned with its environmental stewardship aspect, not its social and economic aspects. But at the same time, the sustainability movement is unmistakably bent on changing attitudes, outlooks, and behavior. And like the feminists, sustainability advocates have been successful in their mission to act as our conscience. We are reminded of this every time we catch ourselves wondering, “Oh wait, can I say that?” or “Hmm...is this eco-ethical?”
Given the disdain for the tray-liban, I think it's time to reinstituted the old anti-ban Facebook group, "Tray Stupide! Give us Back Our Trays."

And I think it's time that we protested. (Seriously, why can the far left have all the fun?)

Here were some of the slogans we brainstormed when we first created this group several

Tray Guevara (Bryce Gerard CMC '11), General Petrayus (Aditya Bindal CMC '11), and I, the Traywalker, came up with some of these hilarious jibes last year at the Tray-liban.
  • Give me tray or give my money back!
  • From time to time, the tray of liberty must be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
  • They can take our trays, but we will break their plates. (Or would that be a plate crime?)
  • Support Tray Rights! Tray-Plate Alliance!
  • The North American Free Tray Agreement.
  • Free Traybet!
  • Ask not what you can do for your tray. Ask what your tray can do for you.
  • Hey, hey, Pomona, what do you say? How many trays did you steal today?
  • Trays are just another word for nothing left to lose.
  • The Lorax speaks for the trays.
  • Fight the Trayliban!
  • Stop the Trayophobes! They want to Pray-The-Tray-Away!
  • Join the ProleTrayriat

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Moderating PSU's Moderator

I am very grateful to Pomona's Student Union (PSU) for bringing me to campus last evening. I would love Claremont to have something analogous to a student-run, independent speakers bureau. While I think PSU unjustly folded when the administration and certain segments of the student body pressured them after their ill-fated immigration debate, I have tremendous respect for the group and my criticisms of it are always intended to be taken as trying to make it better, not worse.

But tonight, I thought their moderator left something to be desired for reasons I'll get into in a moment.

I suspect part of the reason I was brought to speak at PSU on the State of Student Media was to actually advocate and articulate. And yes, be a bit controversial. (In fact, the Facebook event publicizing the event referred to me as "divisive," which is a bit of a biased word to begin with.) So, true to form, I made a crack about how political diversity really made me the only Elephant in the Room and I encouraged Pomona students to get real about their education because I think political correctness is imperilling their -- and by proxy -- my education. Why don't Pomona students criticize professors who fight to disinvite speakers? Why doesn't President Oxtoby speak out against students shouting down invited speakers?

When I tried to criticize Trevor Hunnicutt of The Student Life for some of the shoddy standards I feel are institutionalized at his paper, including plagiarizing The Claremont Independent, the supposed moderator told me not to make it ad hominem. It wasn't. I was just pointing out what had, you know, actually happened. I confess that I didn't do it quite the elegant way that Ilan Wurman CMC '10 did in the question and answer period, but the point still remains. Indeed, Trevor's "retraction" that they ran in The Student Life was two sentences after The Claremont Independent's staff spent nine months researching it. The individual who wrote that story, Travis Kaya, was promoted and insofar as I can tell, never punished or censured for essentially ripping off The Claremont Independent.

Of course arguing that someone is "mean" or resorting to "ad hominem" attacks is a tactic used by some people whenever there is measured criticism that they cannot or will not respond to. Such was the case last evening when both Trevor and the moderator suggested I was being "rude."

And the moderator, despite my ironic suggestion that he was actually a good moderator, seemed more inclined to attack me than to actually moderate the discussion. Several times he interrupted me -- and only me -- in the middle of a sentence and while I was perhaps not as articulate as Abhi Nemani, who in fairness is something of a great speaker (if a tad unoriginal in his thinking sometimes), I think that the moderator knows that there are many ways to give nonverbal cues to indicate you've gone on too long. That he didn't do that, suggests to me a kind of bias. But I leave that for others to decide.

At one point, he called me out for video recording the panelists. He tried to ask me, snidely, of course, where the video would be online. I informed him that it was audio and that I can do whatever I like with the audio or video I take because...

1) California law protects me. 2) I've started to make it a habit of recording every public event at which I am a participant.

Call me paranoid, but I seem to believe reading about two boys who were punished and the only thing that cleared their name was having a video that documented what actually happened.

Oh, and yes, I will continued to criticize The Student Life for typos. I'm a one-man operation that has produced over 1,000 blog posts since I began in September. I don't have "fact checkers" -- paid or unpaid -- and I do the level best I can. A subsidized product, with staff members, ought to be able to do a better job than some guy sitting on his computer.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

More On Tray Banning

I frankly don't understand the thinking behind banning trays on campus.

Here are several of the reasons I don't fully think it was well thought through. I suspect that a lot of people now have a less than ideal vision of the dining hall, particularly as they remember the times when there were trays. From a development office point of view, these students are going to be upset that a huge part of their socializing was altered for seemingly ideological reasons. Isn't a huge part of campus socializing around the dinner or lunch table?

I spoke with some students at Pomona College regarding the tray ban at their campus and they inform me that Frary has become just filthy now that students have no trays. Excess food, rather than falling on trays, falls on the table and the dining hall staff has an already limited work force to keep the place clean.

What's more: Pomona College's Frary Dining Hall actually threw out half their trays and deposited them in a landfill. Not so green, when you think about it.

At Scripps, they still use trays, but only to put the dishes on them. Ironically, this means that they still have to be cleaned.

If someone were really sincere about protesting this tray ban, here's my advice: for a full day, campus wide, refuse to clean your place. Apologize profusely to the dining hall people, but make it very clear that it is not a reflection on them, but on the college as a whole.

Ghost Sighting at Scripps College?

Two Scrippsie freshmen in Clark Hall have been complaining about a shadow that has been following them around the dorm and that there are random gusts of wind in their room.

They also say that they saw this girl came scrambling through the bushes and apparently disappeared.

The girls said that this happened on 601. So you'll forgive me if I somewhat doubt it...

Deb Wood Pledges to Find the Drunken Perpetrators!

Silly Dean Deb Wood is at it again. You remember her, right? She's the administrator who made Scripps College a national laughingstock when she called for Scripps to ban the white party. Here she is tonight promising to punish the "perpetrators" of an alleged bias related incident.

Never you mind, of course, that she has no such power to do so under California's Leonard Law and that at most, all the police can do is charge whatever poor student with "vandalism." Still, it should give us a bit of fright that Dean Wood sees this as one of her jobs. I guess she has to justify that enormous salary she takes in...

What's more troubling, though, is that they won't even tell us what was said, only that we have to trust them that it was pretty offensive. Given the track record of administrators -- the "Hillary is a foxy lesbian -- comment anyone -- I'm inclined to reserve judgment until I get the facts. Here's Dean Wood's email to the entire campus. Could somebody please write in and tell me what was said?

As I advised you last week, The Claremont Colleges have a bias protocol that we follow when bias incidents and/or hate crimes occur. I am saddened and disappointed to begin the academic year with both racist and sexist incidents.

Both types of incidents involved a person or persons unknown scrawling racist and sexist epithets on students' write and wipe boards in the residence halls. Given that these incidents occurred following the end of dry week and substantial drinking, many people might shrug off the incidents, saying it was probably stupid drunks. I ask you not to shrug it off and not to give the perpetrators of these incidents an excuse for their behavior.

Regardless of the intent and regardless of the condition in which the perpetrators may have put themselves, they did harm. The students upon whose doors these words were scrawled were hurt. The people who saw it were hurt. It causes one to wonder what steps have any of the colleges made toward building a supportive, inclusive community when acts like this still occur ?


This kind of conduct constitutes a bias incident and anyone with information about the perpetrator(s) of the incidents should contact an RA, DOS staff member or campus safety.

Anyone in need of support or wishing to discuss this incident is welcome and encouraged to contact the resource which best meets their needs. Resources include:

+staff at OBSA- (909) 621-8248
+ staff at CLSA- (909) 621-8044
+ staff on the Asian American Advisory Board
+ Res Life Staff- (909) 621-8277 or (909) 607-4307
+ Chaplains Office- (909) 621-8685
+ SCORE staff (909) 607-8869
+ Scripps Diversity Coordinating Committee- (Amy Marcus- Newhall or Marla Love)
+ staff at MCAPS ( Monsour) - (909) 621-8202
+ DOS (909) 621-8277

We are a supportive, caring community and bias related incidents will not
be tolerated. Any time a community member becomes aware of a racist,
sexist, heterosexist bias incident on our campus, a potential bias
incident or hate crime, or any other type of crime, they are urged to
appropriate action to combat the incident. These actions might include:

calling campus safety,
photographing the incident,
identifying the perpetrator,
intervening in the moment if safe to do so,
writing a letter or article for one of the student news publications,
sponsoring, attending or participating in educational programming,
encouraging your peers to do the same.


In accordance with the Communication Protocol for Bias
Related Incidents for The Claremont Colleges a binder of incidents is
kept in the Dean of Students Office, located in Balch Hall, room 112,
SARLO and SCORE.


Persons wishing to review this binder may do so during regular office
hours Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 5 PM .

Debra Wood
Vice President & Dean of Students
Scripps College
The Women's College.Claremont
1030 N. Columbia
Claremont, CA 91711
phone:(909)621-8277
fax: (909)607-7081
email:debra.wood@scrippscollege.edu

CMC Alum Named Vice President of California's Largest Foundation

Just in:

CMC alum Joseph M. Pon of Applied Materials was named Vice President of programs for the James Irvine Foundation, which is a California-based, billion dollar foundation.

And before you ask, yes, I did add it to the school's wikipedia page!

I have my criticisms of the James Irvine Foundation, among them their grants to the people of California tend to make more of them doles than true citizens, but that's a conversation for another time. Well done, Mr. Pon.

CGU Prof. Paul J. Zak on Reason.TV

Let me create a short experiment with you:

I strongly dislike California's sales tax hike so I am constantly working on ways to avoid it and/or violate.

One such way is to pay cash for a lot of things on campus. Depending on the teller, you can avoid paying sales tax on most meals, particularly at Pomona College. (In my view, taxing food is immoral and may even be a civil rights issue.)

Still another way to avoid paying the tax is to pay for used appliances via Craigslist, which I turned to to buy nearly all of my cooking ingedrients. (For those who haven't read this masterful piece on Craigslist in Wired, I forcefully recommend it.)

Despite the low price for most appliances on Craigslist, I almost certainly expected to be cheated and even budgeted for that in the amount of money I took out of the bank account. And yet, curiously, I was not. This made me intrigued and then I remembered the thesis of CGU Professor Paul J. Zak's book, Moral Markets -- namely, that trust is built up through markets and that that's what distinguishes our highly social species from others.

Have a look at an interview he did with Reason.TV. It is utterly fascinating.