Yet more responsible rhetoric and non-partisanship from a Pomona College professor of politics:
President Barack Obama is not scheduled to attend the United Nations' conference on climate change in Copenhagen, Denmark until later in the week, but some lawmakers, environmental experts and citizens already know what actions they would like him to take.Never you mind, of course, that none of the nations that agreed to Kyoto actually met their commitments and that carbon dioxide isn't a pollutant at all, but life itself."I would like to hear from him that he's ready to sign a treaty," said Richard Worthington, professor of politics at Pomona College, who is in Copenhagen with a group of students.
Representatives and leaders from all over the world are meeting in Copenhagen for a two-week conference seeking an agreement on how to cut carbon emissions to reduce global warming.
The conference began Dec. 7 and will end on Friday - the day Obama is expected to attend.
"I think it would be good if they actually agreed to some targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions because in my experience with environmental policy is that if something is being done that is harmful to the environment the most effective approach is to say `you need to stop doing that'," Worthington said.
"Of course a lot of things you can't stop completely and we're not going to stop completely emitting greenhouse gas emissions. It's something that's pretty clear as a target that countries are obligated."
2 comments:
"Hack" means "disagrees with you" I assume?
Response to Anon (above):
No.
A hack is defined as someone who is: a professional who renounces or surrenders individual independence, integrity, belief, etc., in return for money or other reward in the performance of a task normally thought of as involving a strong personal commitment: a political hack.
In this case it's more than appropriate, although the "reward" may not be money – it is more probably the sanctimonious feeling all global warming alarmists feel when they lecture those denying neanderthals and insist they're doing nothing less than "saving the planet" from the apocalypse.
In addition to all those inconvenient facts floating around, check this out:
http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/146138
Nuff said.
Post a Comment