
Photo courtesy of Claremont University Consortium web page
I sent this email to
Hughes Suffren last night:
Dear Mr. Suffren,
I was wondering if you might be able to provide some kind of statement regarding Ms. Rachael Ballard's videos. Do you agree with her that OBSA's Kwanzaa event is only for black people?
Thank you,
He has yet to respond to that email, but he did send me this email just a few minutes ago.
| Hughes Suffren | Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM |
| To: CJohnson11@cmc.edu |
Mr. Johnson, I’m not sure where you retrieved the photo of Rachael for your story, but it was not provided “courtesy of OBSA.” Please remove this. Thank you, Hughes Suffren, Dean/Director Office of Black Student Affairs Claremont University Consortium |
|
| Charles Johnson | Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:52 PM |
| To: Hughes Suffren |
The photo is from the OBSA website.
[Quoted text hidden] --
Charles Johnson
Claremont McKenna
Economics-Government
Claremontconservative.com |
|
| Hughes Suffren | Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:02 PM |
| To: cjohnson11@students.claremontmckenna.edu |
To say that the photo was provided courtesy of OBSA is dishonest.
From: Charles Johnson <cjohnson11@students.claremontmckenna.edu>
To: Hughes Suffren
Sent: Tue Dec 15 16:52:49 2009
Subject: Re: Rachael's Photo
[Quoted text hidden] |
|
| Charles Johnson | Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM |
| To: Hughes Suffren |
I disagree, but I will say that the photo is provided courtesy of the OBSA website.
I think, with all due respect, that you have much bigger fish to fry with respect to Ms. Ballard's comments, rather than how her photo was obtained. Instead of repudiating them, you've tried to create a false moral equivalence between frats, which we do not have, and OBSA.
[Quoted text hidden] |
|
Could it be that Suffren shares Ms. Ballard's views? I wrote
about Mr. Suffren and the obligatory racial sensitivity training when I was editor of
The Claremont Independent:
Claremont McKenna's Associate Dean of Students Jennifer Jimenez MaraƱa convened the new RAs for an obligatory, hour-long diversity training this past March in the lounge of Claremont Hall.
Most controversial were the remarks of Hughes Suffren, Associate Dean of Students and head of the Office of Black Student Affairs. According to Dean Suffren, the years since the 1960s have been framed by a constant struggle by its black students to achieve three goals at the Claremont Colleges: "more faces that look like theirs"; "more faculty that look like them" and a "curriculum that spoke to them." [Editor's note: Like Ms. Ballard's media studies courses for one?]
. . .
And so, even forty years after violence and intimidation were excused as a response to a "white culture" on campus, racialist ideology is still justified by the existence of a perceived exclusive majority culture. Returning to the RA meeting in Claremont Hall, Dean Suffren reportedly described CMC students as "culturally insensitive" and asserted that every single year there is a racial incident on Claremont McKenna's campus.
Suffren made much similiar arguments
during the discussion about Ilan Wurman's CI piece on racial clubs and in the letter I have put up that he
sent out earlier that suggested there was some kind of "white culture" on the campuses. Thankfully he affirmed that OBSA events are open to students, without regard to race.
5 comments:
Way to dance around the subject, Suffren. Just like a nasty politician.
You still haven't changed it to photo courtesy of OBSA website, or whatever you said you'd change it too.
It's clear Mr. Suffren will say anything to justify his existence.
After all, if his evolving and not-to be-questioned intrepretation of campus or societal racism was found to be baseless, his rent-seeking days as head of that initiative would be over.
That's why it's important for him to encourage racial division and self-segregation while claiming to do otherwise.
Wow...this blog is such a joke. I was forwarded here by a friend to get the whole story on this affair. All I've really come away with is the impression that you're a little Bill O' Reilly in training - all cheap tricks, attacks, and very little substance. As an actual believer in the conservative tradition, I don't understand your attacks. She has the right to free speech on her own private Facebook account. Your blog posts are the definition of sensationalizing this issue. She is no more a voice of the black community than Hughes Suffren is; she's an individual with her own personal opinions that she is entitled to, no matter how wrong they may be. To say you're not sensationalizing this story is a simple lie that you've attempted to cover up with arguments of "exposing the truth" and trying to somehow tie her position as the head of Scripps party commission with her personal views. She organizes parties...she's not the dean of students. Who cares? You're entitled to your opinions, despite how wrong they pretty much all are. Why attack her for her own beliefs?
@ Anon,
Because someone who has racist viewpoints towards other cultures shouldn't be in charge of anything involving the campus's social structure.
Post a Comment