Monday, March 9, 2009

Huzzah for Pam Gann!

BAN IS OVER -- WITH PERSONAL APOLOGIES FROM PRESIDENT GANN (Though, none from Pomona -- I guess we can't have everything)


March 9, 2009


Memorandum

To: Members of the Claremont McKenna Community

From Pamela Gann, President of Claremont McKenna College

Re: Response to Pomona College’s Banning of Two CMC Students

I have received a number of communications from members of the CMC community in response to Pomona College’s decision on Thursday, March 5, 2009, to ban two CMC students from its campus. Pomona’s action was based on the allegedly disruptive behavior by these students at a meeting that took place on Pomona’s campus last month.

Upon learning of Pomona’s action on Friday morning, March 6, 2009, I also had significant concerns that this action raised important issues relative to free speech and due process, and I and other members of the CMC administration worked diligently over the weekend to address the situation. Along with others, I had to take the time over the weekend to determine as best we could what transpired at the event, and what had taken place at both Pomona and CMC between the time of the talk and the issuance of the ban. We have had to do this without the benefit of a full, formal investigation or formal hearing.

From what I and others have learned, I completely share the concerns expressed that this action was inconsistent with Claremont McKenna College’s understanding and application of the free speech and due process rights that exist for CMC students and that should be respected for all students at The Claremont Colleges.

In my view, the response to this incident should have been framed by The Claremont Colleges’ Policy on Demonstrations, which provides that each institution in Claremont “respects the rights of free speech and peaceable assembly and supports their exercise.” The policy further states that participation in a demonstration or other act of free speech “that is materially disruptive and non-peaceful or involves the substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others on the property of any of The Claremont Colleges or the Claremont University Consortium is prohibited.”

Although the scope of the Policy on Demonstrations may need to be clarified, my view is that it should be properly understood to cover all incidents involving the exercise of free speech rights at public meetings or other open events at The Claremont Colleges. Thus, even if administrators at Pomona and CMC did not consider that this policy applied directly to these circumstances, it should have provided constructive guidance to both administrators at Pomona and CMC with regard to the appropriate resolution of this matter. This did not happen.

Most significantly, in the absence of some showing of a particularized threat to its campus, it would be inappropriate for any member of The Claremont Colleges to ban a student from a sister institution without first providing appropriate due process, which could include pursuing a disciplinary action against the student at his or her home campus. This is the procedure outlined in the Policy on Demonstrations, and the failure to follow this framework deprived the CMC students of important due process protections.

I am pleased to report that, after further consultation and review, Dean Miriam Feldblum at Pomona College has agreed to withdraw the ban against the two students. Although this is an important step, it does not alter the important fact that the ban was inappropriate in the first instance. I therefore offer my personal apologies to the CMC students involved on behalf of Claremont McKenna College.

As a result of this incident, I have requested that Jeff Huang, Vice President for Student Affairs and Dean of Students, conduct a thorough and complete review of this matter. In addition, I plan to address this matter with Pomona College President David Oxtoby and the Council of Presidents of The Claremont Colleges. Through these steps, I am confident that we will be able to clarify our Consortium-wide policies and procedures in this area to insure that free speech and due process protections are properly addressed with all students at The Claremont Colleges.

PBG:th

cc: President David Oxtoby, Pomona College

President Klawe, Harvey Mudd College

President Trombley, Pitzer College

President Schuster, Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences

President Weis, Scripps College

Interim President Hough, Claremont Graduate University

Robert Walton, Claremont University Consortium

Harry McMahon, Chair of the Claremont McKenna College Board of Trustees

25 comments:

Jeremy said...

Huzzah, indeed. Glad to see free speech and due process prevail, as they ought.

Anonymous said...

Wow! I had no idea Gann had it in her.

I still don't like her, but this has really boosted my opinion.

Mark Munro said...

I'm glad that President Gann worked with Pomona to remove the ban, but I still think that the Claremont Colleges could use some discourse on abortion. Hopefully CMC and Pomona can organize a joint forum representing both sides

Amanda C said...

Yeah, that's a serious huzzah. I'm really glad that she didn't just let it go, either: "Although this is an important step, it does not alter the important fact that the ban was inappropriate in the first instance. " Check. I'm glad to see at least one administrator standing up for her students.

Theresa said...

Amanda - let's see if that happens, or if it's just platitudes, before we go cheering. Glad the ban is lifted, though. That was bulls--t.

Greg Zahner said...

I think we deserve to have our FIRE rating downgraded for this and Pomona's boosted to red.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
claremontliberal said...

Dean Holmes just got bitch-slapped by Pam Gann.

H. Highberger said...

Go go Gann! This was such a reasonable and clear-headed response. CMC should be proud, both of its students and its administrators.

Ilan Wurman said...

I fought with Charles over this one, but I deleted a comment. Call Castro whatever you want, but he came through -- so keep the really vulgar stuff out.

Adam Sherman said...

I'm very happy with the CMC administration response from Pam Gann and I appreciate all the hard work from people at the Claremont Independent and Conservative for keeping me updated, keep up the great work.

Anonymous said...

Please stop deleting comments. It seems ironic that the free speech crusaders are so apt at removing "offensive" posts.

Ilan Wurman said...

Anonymous, use your head. This is NOT a public meeting; the same laws don't apply. BUT EVEN SO, if Kyle and David HAD been offensive in the way that some commenters are being here, then I certainly would not have expected Pomona to lift the ban.

Kyle and David acted kindly and appropriately, I suggest that you do so as well.

The Forum said...

Ilan is right-- anonymous inappropriate and offensive comments should be deleted at the blog owner's discretion.

Charles Johnson said...

The Forum,

This blog doesn't receive school funding. Nice try.

But for what it's worth, I disagree with Ilan on deleting anything from the comment section.

Anonymous said...

"Anonymous, use your head. This is NOT a public meeting"

This site is accessible through a quick google search and is linked to by several blogs. If this isn't a public place, why is it so easy to find and gain access to it?

This blog would only be "private" if you needed to register to gain access to it.

Charles Johnson said...

That's probably the dumbest argument I've heard on this blog and I've heard a few really dumb arguments.

This blog is paid for and hosted by me, so it's my property. It is public only in that I let it be public. I set the terms of the comment deletion above. "We will delete any post..."

That said, I don't agree with Ilan. I kind of like it when really disgusting things are said in the comment section.

Rupert said...

But didn't you merge the CC in to the CI? The CI DOES receive school funding. So which is it? From what I can tell this is still Charles' soapbox, and does not represent the CI.

Charles Johnson said...

Hey Rupert (how funny!)

The Claremont Independent has NEVER received a single penny from the administration. The CC is not officially the CI's blog as yet and even there it wouldn't make a difference. There's a reason we call it "independent."

Go do your homework next time.

Anonymous said...

Not from the administration but from ASCMC, but the amount is very small.

Charles Johnson said...

Bullsh--. (I don't swear in print, but that's really bogus.)

We have NEVER accepted a penny from ASCMC.

Charles Johnson said...

I've just checked with Ilan who was last year's editor and with Aditya who is the publisher. Both of them confirmed that we never ever took money from ASCMC.

Ilan Wurman said...

I can corroborate Charles' information. As far as I'm aware, we have never received ASCMC money.

It would certainly be news to us.

But in any event, if we did in the past (which I highly doubt), we certainly do not now.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, it was the Republican Club and not the CI. I stand corrected and feel silly.

Anonymous said...

I still don't like her, but this has really boosted my opinion.